Standards-based assessments, generated by the people who teach.
A platform that lets trainers and faculty generate assessments aligned to a named standard, from their own material, in minutes, and keep the judgement about what ships.
Training organisations, universities and districts
Trainer & Faculty Enablement
Point it at a standard, a competency framework or a curriculum outcome, and at the material you teach from. The platform drafts items mapped to each standard, shows the instructor the mapping, and hands over an editor rather than a finished paper. Instructors approve, edit or reject line by line; what they approve is tagged to the standard it measures, so every assessment the institution runs carries its own alignment evidence.
- Standards-aligned assessments in hours rather than weeks
- Alignment evidence generated as a by-product of teaching
- Instructors who trust the assessment because they authored it
What is in it.
Standard in, items out
Works from national standards, accreditation criteria, competency frameworks or an institution's own outcomes. Every item is tagged to the standard it measures.
On your own content
Items are drafted from the instructor's own courses and materials, so they read like the course, not like a generic bank.
Instructor keeps the pen
Approve, edit, reject, re-draft. The instructor's decisions are logged and the engine learns the institution's preferences over time.
Alignment report
For any assessment, a one-page view of which standards it covers, at what depth, and where the gaps are.
Shared banks
Approved items can be pooled by department or region, with the standard tags intact, so nobody writes the same question twice.